Home Links
|
|
The
glycomacropeptide, derived from the action of rennet on milk during cheese
making, has been reported to suppress gastric secretion in experimental
animals and may play a possible role in appetites control (Chernikov,
1974; Aleinik, 1984; Stan, etal., 1988; Yvon, et. al, 1994). Whey proteins have also been found to have a role in appetite
suppression.
Proteins,
carbohydrates and fats have been reports to be subject to manipulations
and to act as functional foods for appetite control (Dye & Blundell,
2002),
Hall
and others (2003) have claimed that protein are generally agreed to be the
most satiating macronutrient. Different proteins have different effects.
They found that whey proteins were more effective in satiation than
casein. In their abstract,
they stated. “We
investigated the effects of two milk protein types, casein and whey, on
food intake and subjective ratings of hunger and fullness, and on
postprandial metabolite and gastrointestinal hormone responses. Two
studies were undertaken. The first study showed that energy intake from a
buffet meal ad libitum was significantly less 90 min after a 1700
kJ liquid preload containing 48 g whey, compared with an equivalent casein
preload (P<0·05). In the second study, the same whey preload
led to a 28 % increase in postprandial plasma amino acid concentrations
over 3 h compared with casein (incremental area under the curve (iAUC), P<0·05).
Plasma cholecystokinin (CCK) was increased by 60 % (iAUC, P<0·005),
glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 by 65 % (iAUC, P<0·05) and
glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide by 36 % (iAUC, P<0·01)
following the whey preload compared with the casein. Gastric emptying was
influenced by protein type as evidenced by differing plasma paracetamol
profiles with the two preloads. Greater subjective satiety followed the
whey test meal (P<0·05). These results implicate
post-absorptive increases in plasma amino acids together with both CCK and
GLP-1 as potential mediators of the increased satiety response to whey and
emphasise the importance of considering the impact of protein type on the
appetite response to a mixed meal.”
References
Aleinik,
S.I., Stan, E.Y. and Chernikov, M.P. (1984) A glycopetide from κ-casein
and its effect of protein assimilation. Voprosy Pitaniya 2: 47-50
Chernikov,
M.P., Nikolskaya, G.V., Stan, E. Y., Shlygin, G.K. and Vasilevskaya, L.S.
(1974) Effect of casein glycomacropeptide on acid secretion in the stomach
of the dog. Voprosy Pitaniya 1974, No. 2:21-25.
Dye,
L. & Blundell, J. (2002) Functional foods: psychological and
behavioural functions. British Journal of Nutrition 88(6): 181-211.
Hall,
W. L., Millward, D.J., Long, S. J. & Morgan, L.M. (2003) Casein
and whey exert different effects on plasma amino acid profiles,
gastrointestinal hormone secretion and appetite. British Journal of
Nutrition 89(2) 339-348.
Stan,
EY., Ekimovski, A.P. and Aleinik, S.I. (1988) Heterogeneity and
physiological activity of bovine kappa-casein proteolysis products.
Voprosy Pitaniya 1988. No. 1. 1:39-43.
Yvon, M., Beucher, S., Guillteau, P., Le
Huerou-Luron, I. and Corring, T. (1994) Effect of caseinomacropeptide on
digestion regulation. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 34:527-537.
|