ANTI-MICROBIAL
ACTION
Several milk proteins have antimicrobial activity:
Lactoferrin
Lactoperoxidase
Lactoferrin
Lactoferrin is a molecule
of 76,000 molecular weight. It is similar to the transferrin found in the blood
stream where it functions as a carrier of iron. It has been hypothesized that
its role in milk may also involve iron binding. It may bind the iron so tightly
that is no longer available for microbial growth. Human lactoferrin is a major
component of human whey.
There have been reports
that lactoferrin is an effective inhibitor of microbial growth and it is
produced for commercial use in toothpaste in Belgium. Recent reports suggest
that peptide of lactoferrin is overtly bactericidal. Reports from Texas A&
M suggest the hydrolysis of the lactoferrin in whey and greatly enhances its
ability to inhibit the growth of certain pathogenic organisms. It has been
reported that hydrolysis of whole whey with pepsin results in the formation of
significant quantities of such a peptide. Richter and others have suggested
that the hydrolyzed whey might be useful for inclusion in meat products to
inhibit the growth of E coli. As the inclusion of whey in such products
makes it possible to decrease their lipid content, a hamburger product that
could be labeled as low fat and that is safer from a microbiological standpoint
may be possible.
The economic viability of
such a process will depend upon the degree of hydrolysis necessary to obtain
bactericidal activity. If the requisite hydrolysis renders the remaining whey
non functional, the cost may be too high. If on the other had, the proteins are
still functional, there may be a future for this procedure. The peptides have
been reported to bind to microbial membranes and to alter their permeability
resulting in cell death. There is some work underway to isolate these peptides
by an ion exchange process. Others are working in this area and it is one that
I feel holds considerable potential for eventual commercialization.
Companies that I am aware of that are
commercially producing lactoferrin are:
Swedish Diaries Association
(SMR) - they use their own patented process
Tatua Co-operative Dairy
Company in New Zealand
Lacto Bretagne Associes' in
Belgium
Milei in Germany under a
license from Morinaga
DOMO Food Ingredients a
subsidiary of Friesland Dairy Foods in the Netherlands
DMV is reported to have a
process ready to go some time this year. Some of the original procedures use
raw whey as a feed stock, but all will probably convert to whey and more
likely, WPC. The use of WPC reduces the volume of liquid and the amount of
salts initially loaded on the ion exchange columns. These sites produce from
2,000 to 17,0000 pounds of lactoferrin annually.
Biotechnology may change
this whole market. For example, Agennix, Inc. was issued patent WO 9614413 in
May of this year. It describes the production of lactoferrin and selected
fragments of lactoferrin in yeast cells. I expect that it wont be too long
before transgenic goats or cows are capable of similar production.. This may
eliminate traditional whey as a source of lactoferrin.
. More recently lactoferrin has been alleged
to have a number of other physiological and biological functions ( Brock, 1995;
Kussendrager, 1993; Lonnerdal and Iyer, 1995; Adamik and Wlaszczyk, 1996).
Although human and bovine lactoferrin differ,
there is increasing evidence that both serve similar biological functions
(Adamik and Wlaszczyk, 1996; Shidonda, et. al, 1996)
The suggested biological activities of
lactoferrin, in addition to its antimicrobial activity, include:
-ion
transport (Nagasako, et al., 1993)
-antiviral
activity (Ellison and Giehl, 1991; Shimizu, etal. , 1996; Marchetti, etal,
1996.)
-enhanced
antimicrobial activity of peptides derived from lactoferrin ( lactoferricin)
-toxin
binding properties ( Kawakasi, etal., 1992:Giugliano, et al., 1995;
Mattsby-Baltzer, et al.,
1996)
-promotion
of growth of some animal cells ( Nicols, and McKee, 1990;Burrin, et. al, 1996;
Mita, et
al. , 1996)
-platelet
binding (Quian, et al, 1995)
-immunomodulating
effects ( Brock, 1995; Konig, et al. , 1995; Shinoda, et. al., 1996)
-participation
in local secretory immunity in synergism with immunoglobulins and other
protective
factors (Ellison and Giehl, 1991;)
-wound
and wound healing(Bockman and Guidon, 1996;
-anti-inflammatory
(Mattsby-Baltzer, etal., 1996)
Receptors for lactoferrin have been detected
and isolated on activated T and B cells, monocytes, intestinal brush border
cells, platelets and neoplastic cells (Adamik and Wlaszczwk, 1996). Very low
physiologic serum levels of lactoferrin increase upon infection and in some rheumatoid
patients.
Antiviral Activity:
Lactoferrin has been shown to be effective in
protecting against a number of different viruses (Marchetti, etal.,
1996; Shimizu, etal., 1996 )
Marchetti, etal. (1996) reported that both
human and bovine lactoferrin were effective against the herpes simplex virus
type 1 (HSV-1) by inhibiting adsorption of the virus. This activity was
independent of the iron with-holding, since both iron saturated and
apolactoferrin were equally effective.
Lactoperoxidase
Lactoperoxidase is a minor
protein that has been reported to have antimicrobial activity. It is produced
commercially in Belgium under the French dairy group CLE, a subsidiary of Lacto
Bretagne Associes by an ion exchange process and may also be produced in New
Zealand. It is reportedly used as an anti-caries agent in tooth paste.
Lactoperoxidase is a glycoprotein consisting
of a single peptide chain with a molecular weight of 78, 431 Dal. It has 15
half-systemic residues and a much higher isoelectric point (pH 9.2) than most
of the other whey proteins. The carbohydrate content is about 10%, structured
into four or five potential binding sites. Partial loss of some of the
glycosidic components during isolation has been attributed to its
electrophoretic heterogeneity. The enzyme contains a haeme structure, with 1
iron molecule per mole of lactoperoxidase. The conformation of the protein is
stabilized by a strongly chelated calcium ion.
Applications of lactoperoxidase include:
|
Product |
LPO system |
Mode of action |
Results |
|
raw milk |
natural |
preserving |
4 days at 4 C |
|
raw milk |
SCN/hydrogen peroxide |
shelf life |
3 days at 10 C |
|
past. Milk |
SCN/hydrogen peroxide |
shelf life |
21 days at 10 C |
|
cheese milk |
SNC/hydrogen peroxide |
shelf life |
8 days at 4-7 C |
|
yogurt |
LPO |
acidity control |
14 days at 20 C |
|
Emulsions |
LPO/KI/GO |
preserving |
14 days at 20 C |
|
Cosmetics |
LPO/KI/SCN/GO |
preserving |
2-4 months |
|
Dentifrice |
LPO/SCN/LYS/GO |
healing |
daily |
|
Ophthalmic |
LP/KI/SCN/GO |
protectant |
1 week |
|
Anti-tumor |
LPO/GO/Antibodies |
healing |
periodical |
GO = glucose oxidase; LYS = lysozyme; KI =
potassium iodide
Applications are being found in addition to
use as antibacterial agents and the use of the LPs in cosmetics, ophthalmic
solutions, dental and wound treatment, and as anti-tumor and anti viral agents
are of particular interest.
Godfrey, et.al. (1990) found that there was a
critical combination of LPO, glucose, glucose oxidase (GO), iodide and
thiocyanate to be effective in cosmetics. The treatment was effective against a
range of yeasts, fungi and viruses, as well as bacteria for periods of up to 4
months.
Poulson (1986) patented a process for using a
lactoperoxidase system for dental and wound treatment. Hoogedoorn ( 1985) used
LPs in toothpaste or a mouthrinse to reduced acid formation by oral
microoganisms. Clinical studies have supported the possibility that plaque
accumulation, gingivitis and early onset carries may be reduced by appropriate
LPs preparations.
LPO, together with glucose oxidase and
monoclonal antibodies, have been applied in tumor therapy (Stanilawski, etlal.,
1989;Lefkowitz, et.al., 1990). Such treatments may also possibly delay or
eliminate the human virus (HSV I) (Courtois, et.al., 1990) -- or possibly
decrease the transcription of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-coded protein
(Pourtois, et.al. , 1990)
There has been a suggestion the
lactoperoxidase acts synergistically with lactoferrin (Reiter, 1985); secretory
IgA (Tenovuo, 1985) and lysozyme (Roger, etal., 1994)